Let's face it: Evangelicals have never been known for their social activism. Many of us have seen social activism as a distraction from what we have seen as the real responsibility of the church: preaching. Social activism, some of us have believed, is the domain of political and religious liberals who don't believe enough truth to pick a fight over.
I am the pastor of a theologically conservative evangelical church here in Durham. I believe that without conscious faith in Jesus you cannot be saved, and so I do believe our primary task is preaching the Gospel to every person in every country. In other words, I care deeply about evangelism. But, I'd like to suggest three reasons why theologically conservative churches also must be involved in social ministry to the poor, here in Durham and elsewhere in the World. I will offer a biblical reason, a historical reason, and a theological reason.
1. The Bible says that there is fundamentally something wrong with our faith if we don't respond to the needs around us.
There are over 2100 verses that deal with our relationship to the poor. Moses very clearly told the people, "If among you, one of your brothers should become poor...you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be...You shall give to him freely, and your heart shall not be grudging when you give to him, because for this the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake... Therefore I command you, ‘Open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor, in your land." (Deut 15:7-10). Pharisees in Jesus' day tried to insist that the "poor of your land" consisted only of Jews. Jesus, however, in Luke 10, used a parable about a hurt man and a Good Samaritan to make clear that this command applies to all hurting people in our communities.
The egregious sins of Sodom were not just homosexuality and rape. Ezekiel 16:49-50 says, "Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty and did an abomination before me. So I removed them, when I saw it. Sodom's riches caused her to be arrogant and self-centered. This narcissism caused her to forget the poor and ultimately to commit the abomination of homosexuality. But according to these verses, God looks at our lack of being involved in the lives of the poor in the same way He looks at homosexuality.
The New Testament says the same. 1 John 3:17 asks how anyone could possibly have the love of God abiding in him if he shuts up his heart to the poor. James 2:15-17 uses failing to take care of the poor in your community as an example of dead faith.
The conclusion: we cannot say our faith is real if we aren't naturally inclined to be involved in the lives of the poor.
2. The church has always understood its mission to include meeting the needs of its community.
Historically, the church has been found working for change in the least desirable parts of the community. First century documents describe an unusual Christian "outreach": collecting the abandoned dead bodies of societal outcasts to give them a proper burial. Second century documents describe "baby runs," wherein Christians collected unwanted babies left on doorsteps to die.
The watching hostile world took notice. The Roman Emperor Julian, one of the chief persecutors of Christians, admitted in disgust that ‘the godless Galileans feed our poor in addition to their own.'Historian Eberhard Arnold notes, "Most astounding to the outside observer was the extent to which poverty was overcome in the vicinity of the communities, through voluntary works of love... Christians spent more money in the streets than the followers of other religions spent in their temples."
This spirit continued through the centuries. An evangelical Christian named William Wilberforce was at the head of the movement to end the slave trade. The Civil rights movement in the 1960's was led by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., who grounded his message in the truth that all men are created equal.
Charles Spurgeon had a close friend named Lord Shaftesbury, who brought cemetery reform, clean water, sewer systems, and mental hospitals. His work led to the establishment of 10 hour work days and child labor reform laws in London. It was said that Lord Shaftesbury taught much of Spurgeon's congregation to read and kept them alive so Spurgeon could preach to them.
D. L. Moody, the Billy Graham of the 19th century, won thousands of students to Christ. But do you know of his compatriot, John R. Mott, who worked with Moody to build little community centers to get young men off the street? They were called YMCA's.
Evangelical Christians were the authors of both the freedom of conscience in religion and the freedom of the press. They led in the fight to give women an equal right to vote. They are the ones today who are pushing to end the gross violation of human rights. They give, by far, more than any other group to the ministry of needs overseas. And, here at home, they lead in this fight to end this horrible holocaust of abortion.
Helping those in need has always been a visceral reaction for ambassadors of Christ. Wherever they went, the poor within their church and outside their church were cared for.
It is very surprising, then, in light of what the Bible says, and in light of our history, that so many of us don't associate community ministry with evangelicals. How did it get that way?
The answer lies in the rise of liberalism. From the age of Constantine through the "Enlightenment," the Church sat at the head of intellectual advance. Christians founded and directed the most academically prestigious schools. During the Enlightenment, however, people began to question the intellectual integrity of Christianity. David Hume boasted that modern man could no longer believe in miracles. Charles Darwin explained that creation was possible without a Creator. Nietzsche completed everyone's thought, saying, "God is dead." He was no longer necessary.
In response, a "Christian" school of thought arose under Friedrich Schleiermacher which said that Christianity's value was not tied to its historical or scientifical validity. The essence of Christianity, they said, is a right "feeling" toward God. They thought they would thereby rescue Christianity from its moribund trajectory, making it relevant to a world which could no longer believe in angels or demons.
Since the essence of Christianity was not the substituionary death on the cross, "evangelism," as historically understood, was no longer urgent. But all people agreed that taking care of the poor was important. Christians could lead in the way in caring for the poor, and thereby still be relevant, even if it wasn't historically true. The church could embody Christ's presence in the world by contributing to the evolution of mankind.
But not all Christians had bowed their knee to this intellectual Baal. A group (that came to be known as the "fundamentalists") insisted that if Christianity were not factually true than there was no Gospel. These believers saw their purpose in history as restoring the intellectual credibility of the Christian faith.
The word "fundamentalist" no longer has positive connotations. People imagine some slobbering guy about 70 lbs overweight who talks about gun rights and pickets "lesbins, and homersekshulls." But a fundamentalist was one who simply said that the fundamentals of the faith are true. And we should thank God for those faithful brethren! Theirs was a necessary and life-saving voice.
It was there, however, that "social ministry" and "evangelism" became unfortunately separated. One group did social ministry because they didn't believe anything enough to preach it. The other group did evangelism, and viewed it as their most necessary ministry to the world.
That day is over. Many fine seminaries are now devoted to defending the intellectual viability of the Christian faith. Is more work necessary? Of course. But the early church was born into a world that scorned its intellectual credibility. Yet, these Christians excelled in their tangible acts of love to their societies. Theirs was a ministry of word and deed. It is time for Christians again to be known for their blessing to the poor of society.
If societal improvement is considered in our culture to be "liberal," then let the church be liberal! But note, we are not talking about the government's responsibility in this matter. The early Christians did not see their role as voting reforms that would spend everyone else's money on the poor. They gave their own money.
We have considered a biblical reason and an historical reason for why we as evangelical Christians should be involved in ministry to the poor. Let us now consider a theological reason.
3. Our announcement of the Gospel of the Kingdom is to be accompanied by physical signs of the Kingdom
In the New Testament the preaching of the Gospel is often called the preaching of "the Kingdom." Mark 1:14-15 says that Jesus began his ministry by preaching "the Gospel of the Kingdom of God," saying, "The Kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe the Gospel." In the last historical verse of the New Testament, Acts 28:31, Paul described his gospel as "proclaiming the kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ."
What exactly is "the Kingdom of God?" Some have wrongly assumed that it is something that Christians will "build" here. But the most important element of a kingdom is the King! We cannot set up the kingdom now because Jesus has not returned to earth yet. So Paul talks about the Kingdom as something we enter in the future, when Jesus reigns-at that point when there will be an end of hunger and racism and violence and there will be total peace, happiness and blessing.
Christians, who are already members of the kingdom have as their primary objective the announcing of that kingdom. We announce that the future is a place ruled by King Jesus, and that we must be reconciled to Him in order to enter it.
Our lives, like Jesus' miracles, are to be "signs" of the coming Kingdom. Jesus' miracles were not just cool magic tricks He did to convince listeners. He never said, "Now, for my next trick, I'll turn Peter into a grapefruit." Rather, his healing of the body was a sign of the coming Kingdom-a place of eternal healing. People understood the announcement of the Kingdom as they saw the lame walk, the blind see, and the dead rise.
So it was with the early Church. The people believed Philip's message about "the Kingdom of God" when they saw the signs he did in the name of Jesus. "Unclean spirits came out of many who were possessed, and many who were paralyzed or lame were healed." They understood it so much that there was much joy in that city.
But the signs the early church gave of the Kingdom were not just "miraculous." Acts 9 tells of an "ordinary" disciple whose ministry consisted of making clothes. Here again, people "felt" the power of the Kingdom of God through her deeds. When she died, "All the widows stood beside him weeping and showing tunics and other garments that Dorcas made while she was with them."
The church's ministry should "bring joy" to the city. Our community should "feel" the message of the kingdom so tangibly that they weep when we are gone. How many evangelical churches can say that their city "rejoices" because of their presence in it? How many of us could say that our city would weep if were gone?
CONCLUSION
I am grateful that evangelicals seem to be rediscovering this forgotten aspect of ministry. Might all of us remember where we would be without the mercy ministry of Christ, who rescued us when we were poor, sick, blind and naked, and that though He was rich, yet for our sake He became poor, so that we through His poverty might become rich.
Follow Us
Find Us On Twitter, Facebook, RSS, & YouTube